Hanna Llewellyn-Waters- Call: 2000
Summary:
A specialist in criminal matters ranging from fraud to rape. Has also
acted on various licensing matters including liquor licensing, netting
and gaming. A universal advocate who has the ability to adapt her skills
to any scenario put before her.
Details of practice:
Defends and prosecutes all areas of crime including serious offences of
violence, rape, child grooming, indecent images, dishonesty, money laundering,
drugs, fraud and confiscation. Extensive experience dealing with vulnerable
witnesses.
Grade 3 prosecutor.
Counsel on London CPS rape list.
List C: Attorney-General's List of Prosecution Advocates
Notable Cases:
Case name: R v John
Appearance: Prosecution
Category: High Value Theft and contested confiscation proceedings.
Details: Serial high value thief notorious for targeting rich tourists
in Park Lane Hotels, large media coverage, sentence in absence as escaped
from custody.
Case name: R v Burrell and others
Appearance: Prosecution
Category: Conspiracy to defraud.
Details: Ten defendants. Seven tried together.
Case name: R v Ranger
Appearance: Prosecution
Category: Indecent assault
Details: Former police officer. Serious sexual assaults on six boys. Two
of the child witnesses were autistic. PII and similar fact argument. Drafting
of the SOPO.
Case name: R v Al-Badi
Appearance: Prosecution
Category: Rape
Details: Two counts of stranger rape. Legal argument: severance, previous
acquittal/ bad character. IPP. Appeal dismissed.
Case name: R v Parry and Joy
Appearance: Prosecution
Category: Rape/ child cruelty
Details: Sample counts of rape and sexual assault. Child cruelty. Child
complainants/ witnesses.
Case name: R v Rogers
Appearance: Prosecution
Category: Child grooming
Details: Tabloid newspaper sting against a scenes of crime officer. Grooming
children on internet. Legal argument: incriminating articles, reprehensible
behaviour/ bad character. Drafting SOPO.
Case name: R v Shah and Shah
Appearance: Prosecution
Category: Conspiracy to import heroin
Details: Conspiracy to import over 15 kilos of heroin. Prosecuted the
contested confiscation hearing.
Case name: R v Qureshi
Appearance: Defence
Category: Conspiracy to defraud, obtain services by deception and using
false instruments with intent
Case name: R v Tirnaveanu
Appearance: Defence
Category: Forgery, facilitating illegal entry, theft, using false instruments
with intent, obtaining services by deception, acquiring criminal property,
Details: 28 count indictment
Case name: R v Fan
Appearance: Defence
Category: Conspiracy to Defraud
Details: credit card factory with £9 million potential loss
Case name: R v Turkson
Appearance: Defence
Category: Section 18 GBH
Details: GBH. Recorded on CCTV. Self- Defence. Sentence: fine of £500.
Case name: R v D
Appearance: Defence
Category: Attempted witness intimidation
Details: Defendant was a solicitor. Acquitted.
Education:
1999 - 2000
Inns of Court School of Law, London
1998 - 1999
City University
1994 - 1997
St Anne's College, University of Oxford
